ASCO, ITT, KRAS-WT primary OS results: CALGB failed to meet its primary endpoint of OS Cetuximab is not superior to Avastin in 1L KRAS-WT. CALGB/SWOG Phase III trial of FOLFIRI or mFOLFOX6 with bevacizumab or cetuximab for patients with expanded RAS analyses in. CALGB/SWOG Phase III trial of irinotecan/5-FU/leucovorin (FOLFIRI) or oxaliplatin/5-FU/leucovorin (mFOLFOX6) with bevacizumab (BV) or cetuximab.

Author: Kagabar Tetilar
Country: Djibouti
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Travel
Published (Last): 2 June 2013
Pages: 254
PDF File Size: 1.61 Mb
ePub File Size: 18.13 Mb
ISBN: 545-9-70082-831-6
Downloads: 35725
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Jujin

Patients with calhb significant bleeding event within 6 months of enrollment or a gastrointestinal perforation within 12 months of enrollment were excluded unless the perforated bowel segment had been resected.

No significant difference in day mortality was observed 1. To determine if the addition of cetuximab vs bevacizumab to the combination of leucovorin, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin mFOLFOX6 regimen or the combination of leucovorin, fluorouracil, and irinotecan FOLFIRI regimen is superior as first-line therapy in advanced or metastatic KRAS wild-type wt colorectal cancer.

This also contributed to the survival results. Presented June 1, The stratified log-rank test was used to compare overall survival between the biologics.

Meeting Library

See treatment administration and dose modification summary for details eTable 2 in Supplement 2. The majority of patients also had access to both cetuximab and bevacizumab at progression because each biologic therapy was commercially available.

Eighty-two percent of patients of experienced disease progression.

Irinotecan combined with fluorouracil compared with fluorouracil alone as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: The primary end point of overall survival was defined as time of study entry until death.

Continuation of bevacizumab after first progression in metastatic colorectal cancer ML In addition, some patients may have 804055 from subsequent experimental or off-label treatments. Institutional review board approval was required at all participating centers and all participating patients provided written informed consent.

Cetuximab monotherapy and cetuximab plus irinotecan in irinotecan-refractory ca,gb colorectal cancer.


Up to 6 months of prior adjuvant treatment had to have concluded at least 12 months before recurrence. N Engl J Med. Analyses are based on clinical data and patient follow-up as of December 15, Register for email alerts with links to free aclgb articles Access PDFs of free articles Manage your interests Save searches and receive search alerts. Thereafter, patients were randomized 1: Sign in to download free article PDFs Sign in to calgn your subscriptions Sign in to your personal account.

Only patients with confirmed KRAS wt were included in this primary analysis. Sign in to access your subscriptions Sign in to your personal account. The Southwest Oncology Group partner for the present study oversaw specimen biobanking and the distribution of samples to laboratory investigators. These findings persisted following exclusion of patients with any RAS mutations. This eligibility change increased the proportion of study patients who might benefit from cetuximab but also improved the prognosis for the entire group by eliminating patients with negatively prognostic RAS mutations.

Sign in to save your search Sign in to your personal account.

For the primary analysis, researchers identified data from patients with right-sided primary tumors and patients with left-sided primary tumors. James Cancer Hospital, Columbus. Based on these factors, patients and primary outcome events were needed. It is also an important reminder, in this exciting era of precision medicine, that genomics is not the only source of insight into how cancers should be studied and treated.

Among patients with right-sided tumors, treatment with bevacizumab was associated with longer survival than that seen with cetuximab At randomization, the primary physician indicated whether the treatment goal was palliative or potentially curative.

James Cancer Hospital, Columbus. Get free access to newly published articles. Create a free personal account to download free article PDFs, sign up for alerts, and more. Trying to understand differing results of FIRE-3 and Hazard ratio and P value for the RAS analysis are adjusted for prior adjuvant therapy, prior radiotherapy, protocol chemotherapy, and randomization before or after the amendment restricting eligibility to KRAS wild type tumor KRAS is defined as exon 2 codons 12, 13; exon 4, codons; exon 3 codons 59, 61 or NRAS: The data show that patients whose primary tumors originate on the left side of the colon the descending colon, sigmoid colon, and rectum survive significantly longer than those whose tumors originate on the right side the cecum and ascending colon.


Because treatment holidays were used more commonly during the course of the study and because collection of the details of treatment drugs and schedules, dosing and complications has been challenging, it is difficult to infer the effects of subsequent management decisions.

Meeting Library | Meeting Library

A randomized crossover trial showed that these combination regimens were not statistically different, with patients receiving these agents in valgb sequence surviving a median 18 to 20 months. Patients enrolled and consented to the companion study whose tumor was KRAS wt and who received single antibody treatment were included in the primary cohort.

Boundaries were truncated at calbb. Similar trends were observed among patients receiving bevacizumab: Fifty-eight patients remained alive and disease free on the last data survey.

804405 access Subscribe to JN Learning for one year. Also, patients in this study likely had lower tumor burden compared with patients who participated in earlier studies as a result of better imaging at diagnosis as well as the coincidental detection of small cancers when patients undergo diagnostic imaging for other indications.

Patients in that treatment group were removed from the study, received treatment at the discretion of their physician, and were followed up per protocol.